<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bullies on the Board &#8211; What To Do</title>
	<atom:link href="http://condolawguru.com/2009/10/bullies-on-the-board-what-to-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://condolawguru.com/2009/10/bullies-on-the-board-what-to-do/</link>
	<description>Condo Law &#38; HOA Law for Boards &#38; Owners</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 06:34:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Grimm</title>
		<link>http://condolawguru.com/2009/10/bullies-on-the-board-what-to-do/comment-page-/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Grimm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://condolawguru.com/?p=76#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post. Sometimes community websites work very well as the participants are respectful even when offering criticism of the Board or neighbors. Constructive criticism can be beneficial. Bringing educational materials to such a website can be helpful. 

Sometimes they fail miserably because unhappy people use them for a &quot;soapbox&quot; and people who otherwise would like to participate drop out. Sometimes unsubstantiated allegations are made. 

It sounds like this one may have potential for positive effect although I wonder. I often wonder what makes an owner from one association an &quot;expert&quot; sufficiently to talk about what happens in &quot;MOST&quot; associations. I, myself, having experience with hundreds of owners and associations over the years, perhaps over a thousand, still try to be careful not to make generalizations about &quot;most associations,&quot; except to comment on the obvious that I see much of the time which is as apathy and avoidance traits (which seems to be common - where owners do not want to get involved in anything HOA related so Boards and owners become ineffective in effecting change).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post. Sometimes community websites work very well as the participants are respectful even when offering criticism of the Board or neighbors. Constructive criticism can be beneficial. Bringing educational materials to such a website can be helpful. </p>
<p>Sometimes they fail miserably because unhappy people use them for a &#8220;soapbox&#8221; and people who otherwise would like to participate drop out. Sometimes unsubstantiated allegations are made. </p>
<p>It sounds like this one may have potential for positive effect although I wonder. I often wonder what makes an owner from one association an &#8220;expert&#8221; sufficiently to talk about what happens in &#8220;MOST&#8221; associations. I, myself, having experience with hundreds of owners and associations over the years, perhaps over a thousand, still try to be careful not to make generalizations about &#8220;most associations,&#8221; except to comment on the obvious that I see much of the time which is as apathy and avoidance traits (which seems to be common &#8211; where owners do not want to get involved in anything HOA related so Boards and owners become ineffective in effecting change).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

