<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Homeowner Landscaping &#8211; Can The HOA or Condo President Obliterate It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://condolawguru.com/2010/01/homeowner-landscaping-can-the-hoa-or-condo-president-obliterate-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://condolawguru.com/2010/01/homeowner-landscaping-can-the-hoa-or-condo-president-obliterate-it/</link>
	<description>Condo Law &#38; HOA Law for Boards &#38; Owners</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:13:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Grimm</title>
		<link>http://condolawguru.com/2010/01/homeowner-landscaping-can-the-hoa-or-condo-president-obliterate-it/comment-page-1/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Grimm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://condolawguru.com/?p=169#comment-444</guid>
		<description>If you want to tell me what case you are talking about I can look it up. In California, Civil Code Section 1363.04 prevents the association from spending association funds to support a candidate. And 1363.03 says associations must provide equal access to resources meaning that all candidates should be treated equally when association meeting rooms or communications are offered to a candidate for campaigning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to tell me what case you are talking about I can look it up. In California, Civil Code Section 1363.04 prevents the association from spending association funds to support a candidate. And 1363.03 says associations must provide equal access to resources meaning that all candidates should be treated equally when association meeting rooms or communications are offered to a candidate for campaigning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PSmith</title>
		<link>http://condolawguru.com/2010/01/homeowner-landscaping-can-the-hoa-or-condo-president-obliterate-it/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>PSmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://condolawguru.com/?p=169#comment-437</guid>
		<description>Hello,
My Association is incorporated, and the current management company is also incorporated.  How does the recent Supreme Court ruling affect elections (regarding unlimited funds for campaigning).  A few years ago legislation changed to make certain HOA requirements under Election Rules, but now can the assocation and/or management company throw unlimited money at elections for their candidate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
My Association is incorporated, and the current management company is also incorporated.  How does the recent Supreme Court ruling affect elections (regarding unlimited funds for campaigning).  A few years ago legislation changed to make certain HOA requirements under Election Rules, but now can the assocation and/or management company throw unlimited money at elections for their candidate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
